On 07/10/2010 02:20 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 02:15:41PM CEST:
On 07/10/2010 08:18 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I've pushed the patch now but dropped the addition of `+' from _AS_TR_SH
on the grounds that we should only add what we expose in the testsuite.
Hope you don't mind.
This breaks GCC. Is this worth a blitz 2.67 release?
What breaks GCC? The commit I just pushed this morning or the `+'
thingy that I excluded from the commit? Please do not answer yes or no.
Pointer type sizeof.
There is "AC_CHECK_SIZEOF(void *)" in configure.ac. Of course, GCC
forces you to use one particular Autoconf version, so strictly speaking
it is not "broken", but many other packages do not and they will fail.
Paolo
