On 07/10/2010 12:18 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>     Fix regression of AC_CHECK_SIZEOF on pointer types.
>     
> +++ b/doc/autoconf.texi
> @@ -6957,6 +6957,7 @@ argument was used when cross-compiling.
>  For example, the call
>  
>  @example
> +...@c If you change this example, adjust 
> tests/semantics.at:AC_F77_DUMMY_MAIN usage.
>  AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *])

Is that a typo in the comment?

> @@ -379,13 +379,17 @@ AT_CHECK_MACRO_CROSS([AC_CHECK_SIZEOF struct],
>  AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([struct x], [], [struct x { char c; int x; };])
>  AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([const struct x], [], [struct x { const char *p; int x; };])
>  AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([struct nosuchstruct])
> +# Taken from autoconf.texi:Generic Compiler Characteristics.
> +AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([int *])

since this test doesn't really seem to be the AC_F77_DUMMY_MAIN test?

-- 
Eric Blake   [email protected]    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to