On 08/20/2010 09:51 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Would you accept a patch to document $at_status being usable in the RUN-IF-FAIL and RUN-IF-PASS arguments of AT_CHECK (including coverage of course)?
That sounds good to me.
On 08/20/2010 09:51 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Would you accept a patch to document $at_status being usable in the RUN-IF-FAIL and RUN-IF-PASS arguments of AT_CHECK (including coverage of course)?
That sounds good to me.