* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:22:17PM CEST: > We _really_, _really_ need a stable branch of Autoconf where every > regression is treated the same way as security problems and released > in a matter of days. And where only regressions are fixed using the > _least invasive_ approach.
FWIW, I agree that a stable branch would be a good idea. Or, if that is less work, start one in presence of regressions and just cherry-pick from master. (In the latter case, stable would have to be fake-merged or rewound after new feature releases.) It probably won't have to be a long-term branch, as major issues are usually found fairly quickly. Cheers, Ralf
