Hi Eric, thanks for the review.
I've followed most of your advices, so I'll just snip them out in
my answer.
On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> > +@code{ksh93} (2011) and @code{bash} 4.1.5 on Debian:
> > +
> > +@example
> > +$ @kbd{cat> foo.sh}
>
> I'd write this as @kbd{cat >foo.sh <<\EOF}
>
Sorry, the `>' is spurious, I meant to write just "cat foo.sh", as is
done in other examples of the manual (and is IMHO good because it
introduces less noise). I've fixed my patch in this direction; hope
that's OK with you.
> ACK with those additional fixes. And sorry for my delayed review.
>
Well, then sorry for my delay answer ;-)
Thanks,
Stefano
