On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 8:29 PM Zack Weinberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we would prefer the macro to be named AC_FC_CRAY_POINTERS, and > I wonder whether there should be a _F77_ variant -- Cray pointers have > been around since the 80s, haven't they?
The latest patch renames the macro to plural (e.g. AC_FC_CRAY_POINTERS), and also introduces an additional macro for F77 compilers. > Also, I don't recognize your name as > a prior contributor to Autoconf. This is more code than we can accept > without a copyright assignment. If you've already gone through that > process, or your contribution would be covered by your employer's > assignment, just let me know; otherwise you need to follow the > instructions on the form at > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future I was contacted by FSF today, so I'll begin the copyright assignment process ASAP. I will let you know once it's been completed.
