--- Olly Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-8<-
> If I'm going to rewrite it (nobody's objected yet, so I guess I will),
> I can incorporate this knowledge. So far I think we have:
>
> * "CC" is an unwise choice for DOS/Windows (not a problem if we check
> that the compiler groks C++ so we can ignore this)
>
What do you mean CC is an unwise choice for DOS/Windows. I use it all the time
for DOS/Windows. Check out www.mingw.org.
> * Prefer "aCC" to "CC" (appears to be safe everywhere)
>
Can you recapsulate why?
> * "cl" could be a lisp compiler on Unix - perhaps only check for it on
> DOS and Windows
>
Why not use AC_PATH_PROGS and put cl last in the list?
=====
---
Earnie Boyd: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
Cygwin Newbies: <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html>
__Minimalist GNU for Windows__
Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32>
Mingw Home: (Coming Soon)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
