Re: Patch to avoid unnecessary uses of AC_TRY_RUN

[Earnie Boyd]

--- Steve Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-8<-
> Wow, that's pretty clever!  But since any nonzero value is considered
> "true" by C, I worry whether a comparison is guaranteed to return `1' if
> true.  To my surprise, my second edition K+R claims that this is so for
> ANSI C.  Has it always been the case that `0<5' is `1'?
-8<-

I think I remember cases (VAX?) of 0<5 produces -1.
 

=====
---
   Earnie Boyd: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
            __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
Cygwin Newbies: <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html>
           __Minimalist GNU for Windows__
  Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32>
    Mingw Home: (Coming Soon)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com