>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Ian> That's because the macro was intended for use with GNU make, to
Ian> decide what the default compilation rule should be.  

Ah, OK.  Thanks Ian!


Ian> On the other hand, changing it breaks backward compatibility for
Ian> no real advantage.  

I was led to this question while prospecting how to finish cleaning
the interlingualization :) of Autoconf.  We already have a source
producing layer which is OK, but we need to abstract the search for
the compiler, preprocessor and so on.

Hence the need for uniformity.  But you are right:

Ian> You could just mark it obsolete, and invent a new macro with a
Ian> better name.

since we'll introduce new names, there's no big problem but of ethic:
seeing tests which pretend to be more general than the appear to be.

Akim

Reply via email to