>>>>> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mo> Why don't we just merge the AC_CANONICAL_BUILD macro into the
Mo> AC_CANONICAL_HOST macro and not print out the --build option. The
Mo> --host option would still be used to give the cross triple and the
Mo> --target option would not showup in the output unless
Mo> AC_CANONICAL_TARGET was used in configure.in.
It is just in terms of documentation and symmetry that I'm in favor of
three macros. But definitely HOST will require BUILD, and TARGET will
require HOST.
Akim
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Akim Demaille
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Mo DeJong
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Pavel Roskin
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included) Ian Lance Taylor
