--- Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -8<- > itself a hack. What I feel is a hack is the fact that it must be used > to disable the "-g -O2" that autoconf adds to the compiler flags. > Does this make any sense? > So, Ossama, i.e., you want the default to be nothing and if you want to add the switches the use the common means. Is this correct? Cheers, ===== --- Earnie Boyd: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__ Cygwin Newbies: <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html> __Minimalist GNU for Windows__ Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32/> Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default... Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default for gcc/... Pavel Roskin
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default for... Ossama Othman
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default for gcc/... Russ Allbery
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default for gcc/... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default for... Ossama Othman
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by def... Ossama Othman
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by... Akim Demaille
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default for gcc/... Earnie Boyd
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default for gcc/... Earnie Boyd
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default for... Ossama Othman
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by default... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Why is "-g -O2" enabled by def... Ossama Othman