On Jun 13, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm tempted to say he is right. Why don't we just check for the exit
> status?
Because some compilers just print a warning message and proceed. GCC
on HP/UX without GNU as is a good example.
> It should be
> if ${CC-cc} -g ... 2&>1 | grep . >/dev/null; then
Yup.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al,... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, e... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Akim Demaille
