On Jun 18, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, how about this patch? It uses cmp instead of wc. Nope, you must use `tail +16' to skip the initial header of the object file. As I wrote before, some object file formats store timestamps in the first few bytes. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very rob... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Assar Westerlund
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas Dickey
