On 4 Jul 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jul 4, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If it makes the build go faster for 99% of the folks out there, we > > should use it. > > Does it? I really don't know. Taking your argument further, why > shouldn't -pipe be the default in GCC when it is supported? This > wouldn't require any changes in autoconf. That seems like a good question to post to a gcc list. Perhaps this will be added to gcc 3.0. That still does not help all the folks running onlder versions of gcc. This change would need to be added to autoconf if it were to do any good in the next couple of years. Mo DeJong Red Hat Inc
- Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by d... Mo DeJong
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by d... Akim Demaille
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Harlan Stenn
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Akim Demaille
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Lars Hecking
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by defau... Marty Leisner
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Lars Hecking
- Re: Should gcc use the -pipe option by default? Mo DeJong
