Hello! On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Mike Castle wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 01:01:09PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > I believe it would be more constructive to make M$VC accept .cc extention > > is some non-interactive way. Anybody knows how? > > $(CP) foo.cc foo.cpp > $(CC) foo.cpp This should be the last resort. I believe that -TP should fix the problem, but I cannot test it. Set CXX='cl -TP' and check if the tests work better. Another related question - could you make sure that "cl -E" exits with a non-zero errorlevel if it encounters missing include files? Regards, Pavel Roskin
- Should the C++ sourcefile extension be changed? Morten Eriksen
- Re: Should the C++ sourcefile extension be changed? Pavel Roskin
- Re: Should the C++ sourcefile extension be changed... Mike Castle
- Re: Should the C++ sourcefile extension be cha... Pavel Roskin
- Re: Should the C++ sourcefile extension be... Lassi A. Tuura
- Re: Should the C++ sourcefile extensi... Pavel Roskin
- Re: Should the C++ sourcefile ext... Lassi A. Tuura
- Re: Should the C++ sourcefile... Pavel Roskin
- [Autoconf] Re: Should the C++... Lassi A. Tuura
- Re: [Autoconf] Re: Should the... Pavel Roskin
- Re: Should the C++ sourcefile extension be changed? Earnie Boyd
