Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...] I mean if you do cc conftest.c -o conftest, and afterwards
> there is no file "conftest", but there is a file "conftest.exe" that
> wasn't there before, that should be pretty conclusive, no?
Not really, no. For instance, Cygwin does this funny thing where they
map all files named ``something.exe'' to also match any inquires to a
file named ``something''.
So you could do:
$ cat > conftest.c
int main(void) { return 0; }
^D
$ gcc -o conftest.exe conftest.c
$ ls
conftest.exe conftest.c
$ ls conftest
conftest
$
And further:
$ rm conftest.exe
$ ls conftest*
conftest.c
$ gcc -o conftest conftest.c
$ ls
conftest.exe conftest.c
$
(So, in the Cygwin case it doesn't really matter whether you set the
executable suffix to ".exe" or "", I guess.)
Regards,
Morten
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Morten Eriksen
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Pavel Roskin
- Re: AC_PROG_CC not working Earnie Boyd
- RE: AC_PROG_CC not working Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: AC_PROG_CC not working Earnie Boyd
