On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 02:26:27PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
: > : Are you suggesting that "autoconf" issues a warning as well?
: >
: > Yes, if there's no case where generating a configure-script under such a
: > circumstance is useful...
:
: It has a low priority for me. I'll not object if anybody else does it.
OK, I just wanted to know if there was a reason for the current behaviour
before I considered working on a patch for it. Since noone else has objected,
I just might create one :)
: > Maybe the ac_unique_file test should ensure that ac_unique_file really is a
: > file?
:
: Certainly no. I've seen many cases when a directory (even ".") is used.
Noted.
Lars J
