Assar Westerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And I've not merged my brain with m4 but it wasn't obvious to me that I > needed to add some m4-code inside the test just because I used a string > starting with AF* in my C-code. I think it's a rather dubious feature myself. :/ AF_INET isn't a particularly uncommon thing to use as part of a test of some network function or another. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- undefined macro: AF_INET ? Assar Westerlund
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Akim Demaille
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Assar Westerlund
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Akim Demaille
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Russ Allbery
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Assar Westerlund
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Russ Allbery
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Akim Demaille
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Lars J. Aas
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Akim Demaille
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Russ Allbery
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Akim Demaille
- RE: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: undefined macro: AF_INET ? Akim Demaille
