On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:23:23PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: : On 16 Feb 2001, Alexandre Oliva wrote: : : > On Feb 16, 2001, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > : > > I see. But we don't need reentrancy for configure, do we? : > : > Nope. Not even for config.status, AFAIK. We just need concurrency, : > not reentrancy. Unless a new requirement has entered the picture. : : Sorry, I meant concurrency. Configure-test concurrency will be introduced in Autoconf 3.0 :) Expect a lot of sub-shelling and here-doc scripts... Lars J -- Innovation is one percent inspiration and ninetynine percent perspiration, and in my case; twice that... -- Norville Barnes, `The Hudsucker Proxy'
- [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Akim Demaille
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Lars J. Aas
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Akim Demaille
- RE: [patch] remove config.status race condition Tim Van Holder
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Pavel Roskin
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition akim
- Re: [patch] remove config.status race condition Akim Demaille
