Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The key question here is, if a program requires fork(), would it
> normally work with Amiga's vfork()? My guess is no, so this patch would
> not be correct.
I like the idea of testing for fork() and making sure it works. The only
part I disagree with is the #define of fork to vfork. The latest version
appears to correct that, so I think the patch is now reasonable. If
you're only using fork to spawn processes, you can check for HAVE_FORK and
HAVE_VFORK and use vfork instead.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
