On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 03:29:17PM +0200, R�diger Kuhlmann wrote:
> [fork + vfork + ac_fork + ac_vfork]
>
> I guess you know _I_ agree, but "the others" don't seem so.
Suits me just fine.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea.
- RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Eric Siegerman
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Eric Siegerman
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Paul Eggert
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Eric Siegerman
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() R�diger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Paul Eggert
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() R�diger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() R�diger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Paul Eggert
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Eric Siegerman
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Akim Demaille
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Akim Demaille
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Akim Demaille
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() R�diger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Akim Demaille
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() R�diger Kuhlmann
- Re: [autoconf] AmigaOS fork() Paul Eggert
