Re: snprintf function portability

[Kevin Ryde]

Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.  How about the following patch instead?
> I tried to tighten up the wording a bit.

No worries about rewording, but perhaps the point that sparc64 solaris
7 doesn't truncate the output at all could be retained, or made
clearer.  (Obviously it's a bug, but that doesn't help when trying to
use it :-).