Paul Eggert wrote: > > > From: Mike Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:40:50 -0700 > > > > Does that mean that autoconf should limit itself to > > the POSIX portable file name character set? > > Of course. If Autoconf uses non-POSIX file names (other than as part > of a test for file name portability, or after such a test succeeds), > then that is a portability bug that should get fixed.
And when I was getting to like Autoconf. Now I'll have to fork it to get my needs for portability met. Way to go, Paul. ;^D Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
