Paul Eggert wrote: > > I think this idea is a blind alley. If we want to use modern shell > features, then we should go ahead and require the "configure" user to > have a modern shell. That's much simpler. We've already started down > that path with the LINENO changes. >
Wouldn't this be solvable by autoconf supplying it's own Shell executable? Let's see...uhm...autosh sounds like a good name. It wouldn't need to be interactive friendly so perhaps a starting point would be the old Linux ash shell. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
