On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 03:43:54PM -0400, Dale E Martin wrote: > > > And I also have a fallback that can use an environment variable PCCTSROOT: > > > > That's not too bad. What would be cool is if pccts installed a pkg-config > > specification. > > I don't know what you mean by this, but if I knew I could probably help > make it happen upstream. Could you elaborate for me?
See <http://www.freedesktop.org/software/pkgconfig/> This is what glib/gtk+ are using now. > > i'm just using C (not C++). Is there really that much boilerplate support > > code to justify creating a library? > > Well, there are a few files and they have to be compiled. In my mind that > justifies a library. Otherwise everyone handles this problem slightly > differently - either copying the code in and getting out of sync from time > to time, or something else. > > > Dunno. i'm pretty satisfied already. > > Yes, the current Makefile seems to work fairly well - it's just the lack of > a standard place for the headers and the "precompilable" stuff that is the > minor annoyance I see. A "make install" could address both of those > issues. Hrm. How about automake support? -- Victory to the Divine Mother!! ... after all, why compete? http://sahajayoga.org http://why-compete.org
