> Well, it just happens that you have a problem with something which can > be named a bug, but it turns out it is also bound to something which > is a problem in Autoconf. This problem is that we should not use `:' > in this argument. The reason is that on an architecture such as DOS, > where the `:' is `;', then your > > AC_PATH_PROG(CGICC_CONFIG, cgicc-config, no, [$1/bin:$PATH]) > > requires *two* different splits. So, would you consider it a shame to > ask you to write > > AC_PATH_PROG(CGICC_CONFIG, cgicc-config, no, [$1/bin $PATH]) > > instead? I will explain this in the documentation once I have also > collected other opinions from this list.
I'll be happy to make that change. That's certainly something I would not have caught. Thanks for your help!
