> From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:37:00 +0200 (CEST) > > > return $ac_func != 0; > > This doesn't work in C++ if the function is overloaded.
OK, but doesn't the current AC_CHECK_FUNC have that problem already? And likewise for AC_REPLACE_FUNCS, AC_CHECK_DECL, etc.? It would be nice to add support for overloaded functions, but I suspect it won't be trivial. In the meantime, it would be nice to fix the tests for ordinary (non-overloaded) functions.
