On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 12:49:13AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > > From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 19:20:50 -0400 > > > > or a poorly designed configure check (inline isn't c89-standard). > > There must be some confusion here. The code in question is testing > whether "inline" is supported, so it's appropriate for it to use > "inline" as part of the test.
and since the test doesn't work properly, it's likely that it could be improved. -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
