On Tuesday 23 July 2002 04:14 pm, Pavel Roskin wrote: > By the way, is it intentional that the autogen binary is called > i386-redhat-linux-autogen? I think it's a bad idea. I'm currently trying > to use Autogen to generate one Linux driver from another (spectrum_cs.c > from orinoco_cs.c in case you are curious). I want to distribute the > template.
I would be, yes. > I don't want to guess the name of autogen based on the > architecture and the distribution. > > P.S. Your binary package uses normal names. It must be a side effect of > using autoconf-2.53 generated configure and using %configure, which > expands to "./configure i386-redhat-linux ..." on RedHat 7.3. I have no idea. It could also be libtool because I occasionally find argv[0] referencing "lt-autogen". It's likely another mechanism tho. I certainly agree, it should not be gratuitously be changed. > > > BuildRequires: guile-devel libxml2-devel > > > > It requires libxml2 IFF you care about xml2ag. > > If you don't supply it, it's quietly suppressed. > > So, strictly speaking, it is not required. > > libxml2-devel is the only requirement I didn't change! But I agree, this > should not be required (checked by uninstalling libxml-devel and > recompiling the package). So, is there a "BuildRecommended: libxml2-devel" ? = = Bruce Korb <first initial + last name at gnu dot org> AG URL: http://autogen.sourceforge.net
