On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:17:17PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "tomas" == tomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > >> NEON_COMPAT="$NEON_COMPAT scm_c_string2str.lo" > tomas> ^^^^ EEEK! ;-) > > [...] > > tomas> If I understand the configury documentation correctly -- isn't using > tomas> explicit dynamic object endings a ``Don't Do That?'' and exactly what > tomas> $(LIBOBJS) or $(LTLIBOBJS) is supposed to handle for you? For .lo is > tomas> platform specific... > > No. `.lo' is portable. What wasn't portable in the way people used > to define LTLIBOBJS from LIBOBJS was the hardcoding of `.o'.
Ah, I stand corrected. Thanks a lot for the clarification. Then your suggestion makes indeed a lot of sense. Regards -- tomas
