"Steven G. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2002-11/msg00009.html
Akim understands the issues here better than I do, and I defer to his expertise here. However, he's been busy so I'll step in and give my own reaction. I think these changes will be improvements to Autoconf even if they're not perfect and can be improved later, so I'm inclined to accept them. A few things, though: * We need copyright papers from you for a big change like this. I'll follow this up via private email. * The changes need documentation, both in NEWS and in autoconf.texi. * We need to integrate the changes into the current CVS autoconf. (I don't think this should be too much trouble.) PS. Thanks for bugging us about this again.
