[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes: > However, since none of the autoconf maintainers have replied yet, I fear > this whole discussion is moot ...
I don't think it's moot. I think the original idea is a good one, and that there needs to be a GNU standard, and that something along the lines that you've proposed looks quite reasonable. My understanding is that you're going to fly a suggestion past RMS. If he likes the idea too, we can put something into Autoconf (though I'm not quite sure what it will be, to be honest; it sounds Hmm, what sort of thing were you looking for in a reply?
