Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately there's no such thing as "truly invalid C", in the sense > that every possible C compiler, whether conforming or not, will exit > with nonzero status when asked to compile it. This is because people > are free to add extensions. The best we can do is to write code that > fails on all practical implementations.
Does anyone know how "char test[(whatever)? 1: -1];" fares? paul _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
