Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Steven G. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> (Which begs the question: shouldn't AC_PROG_CC_STDC be renamed to
>> AC_PROG_CC_C89, for consistency?)
>
> Yes, and AC_PROG_CC_STDC should refer to the best (typically, latest)
> C standard. That is, AC_PROG_CC_STDC should attempt to set the
> compiler into C99 mode, and failing that should attempt to set it in
> C89 mode. So Roger, please make that part of the next revision for
> your patch.
Sure.
> Also, Roger you'll need to get papers signed for your contribution
> to Autoconf. Have you already started the ball rolling on this?
> If not, I can send you the initial forms.
I haven't. If you could send me the forms, that would be great.
Please could you allow it to include all future autoconf contributions
as well?
Thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
