Hi,
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:35:58PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Speaking of manuals, the FAQ section of the Automake manual also
> have a node called "CVS" and listing pros, cons, and workarounds.
I have noticed a typo there, see the patch below.
As usual, thank you very much for nicely written documentation.
Stepan
Index: doc/automake.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/automake/automake/doc/automake.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -r1.68 automake.texi
--- doc/automake.texi 24 Nov 2004 22:44:17 -0000 1.68
+++ doc/automake.texi 2 Dec 2004 09:42:19 -0000
@@ -7431,7 +7431,7 @@
update, not the original timestamp of this revision. This is meant to
make sure that @command{make} notices sources files have been updated.
-This times tamp shift is troublesome when both sources and generated
+This timestamp shift is troublesome when both sources and generated
files are kept under CVS. Because CVS processes files in alphabetical
order, @file{configure.ac} will appear older than @file{configure}
after a @command{cvs update} that updates both files, even if
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
