"Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From a plain-old-user's point of view, I'd much rather see Roger's > original version. I don't want to rely on undocumented autoconf > internals any more than I have to.
Part of the motivation for keeping that stuff hidden is that we don't want people to switch based on whether our macro "thinks" the compiler is "C99" or "C89" or "not". They should switch based on the particular feature that they need. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
