Hi,
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 04:21:44AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> How about portability of "test -d" being applied to "special
> files" (char/block device files, pipes/sockets, soft/hard links to
> directories/files etc.)?
so the question is:
If I change AS_EXECUTABLE_P the proposed way, it may succeed on
executable special file (fifo, device file, etc.) does it mind?
Wdyt?
Regarding symlinks, we currently rely on the fact that `test -f' succeeds
on a symlink to a regular file. So I see no problem if we start to rely
on the fact that `test -d' fails on that symlink.
Have a nice day,
Stepan
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
