>>> "Stepan" == Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The option 3) is much safer, and we should rather spend our effort there. > One question remains, what is "autoconf with functions". > Autoconf-3 will be probably able to assume shell functions. > But I don't think we have to wait or split the source. I think we can > introduce and experimental "functions" option to autoconf, perhaps > declared in configure.ac before AC_INIT, which would switch on the > support of shell functions. FWIW, I think this is the best agenda too. And in fact, these functions don't really need to be "experimental": I doubt we will face problems. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
