Hi,
thanks. I'll make a few comments, but we should wait for Paul's
opinion, it's more important than mine.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:16:08PM +0000, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
> +Display a message when @code{AC_OUTPUT} is called.
The node describing AC_OUTPUT should be changed, too. We should explain
that if there are messages pending from AC_MSG_END or AC_MSG_NEED,
these messages are displayed, _insted of_ the normal procedure.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] AC_MSG_NEED (@var{dependency-description}, @ovar{priority})
My idea was to have AC_MSG_NEED with args
(@var{dependency-name}, @var{dependency-text}, @ovar{priority})
used like
AC_MSG_NEED([flex],
[Get the latest version of lex from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/flex/.])
Which would display:
You should get:
flex Get the latest version of lex from
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/flex/.
I thought that having two parameters, NAME and TEXT, could help some
tools which would trace all AC_MSG_NEED calls, in order to get the list
of all requiremets for the package.
But I think Paul didn't like it.
> +AC_MSG_NEED([A lexical analyser is needed by Bison, such as Flex or
> +lex.])
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not sure if there are sufficient []'s there....
Yes, this is correct.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] AC_MSG_END (@var{message}, @ovar{priority})
I think Paul's idea was to haves
AC_MSG_NOTICE (@var{message}, @ovar{priority})
if the second argument is omited, the message is displayed immediately.
Otherwise, the message is saved for the end.
Thank you for the proposal. Let's see the reactions.
Stepan
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
