Thankyou to all for the replies. This makes musch more sense now.
Cheers Chris Paul Eggert wrote:
Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:I noticed that Paul Eggert uses '{print $ 1}'.Yes, I found that to be by far the best solution, as '$ 1' makes it clear that it's the Awk '$1' rather than the M4 '$1'. The $[1], [$]1, and $[]1 solutions are used when you're trying to quote the m4 '$1', and they work for Awk too, but it might confuse the reader into thinking that another level of M4 quoting might be involved. (The @S|@1 solution is too ugly for words, of course.) _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
