Harlan Stenn wrote:
For packages that are "big enough" (ie, that have a large/slow run of "configure"), this is an unnacceptable solution.
Even small packages with few needs beyond what ought to be simple, vanilla POSIX stuff require monsterous configs. Isn't everything "big enough"? :) _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
