Hello,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:49:16AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> It must be nice to have such a simple project. :-)
>
> For my own project, released autoconf and automake have been fine, but
> released libtool has never been quite good enough. So for many years,
> I have used hand-tweaked versions of CVS libtool. I can't expect the
> other developers to reproduce the libtool I am using. [...]
I suspect that the rule "where is a will there is a way" applies here.
If I were in your situation, I'd probably check in only the files
brought by libtoolize, the rest of bootstrap would remain.
But yes, you are right: till now, I was lucky enough to avoid any
fiddling with libtool. :-)
Have a nice day,
Stepan
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
