Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 02:37:13PM CEST:
>
> The AC_C_TYPEOF documentation makes it sounds as if, in order to use
> 'typeof', a program needs to do
>
> #if HAVE_TYPEOF || defined typeof
>
> But actually, looking at the implementation in c.m4, a
>
> #if HAVE_TYPEOF
>
> is enough. Here is a documentation fix.
Thank you for this bug report (and the others)!
> ***************
> *** 6296,6302 ****
> If the C compiler supports GCC's @code{typeof} syntax, define
> @code{HAVE_TYPEOF}. If the support is available only via a different
> spelling of the keyword (e.g., @code{__typeof__}), define @code{typeof}
> ! to that spelling.
> @end defmac
>
> @defmac AC_C_PROTOTYPES
> --- 6296,6302 ----
> If the C compiler supports GCC's @code{typeof} syntax, define
> @code{HAVE_TYPEOF}. If the support is available only via a different
> spelling of the keyword (e.g., @code{__typeof__}), define @code{typeof}
> ! to that spelling and define @code{HAVE_TYPEOF} as well.
> @end defmac
>
> @defmac AC_C_PROTOTYPES
>
Instead of the repetition, why not just s/define @code{typeof}/also &/ ?
Cheers,
Ralf
