[ Your mailer has very amusing ways of messing with addresses. :) ] Hi Keith,
* Keith MARSHALL wrote on Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:48:31PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote, quoting Peter Breitenlohner: > >> Isn't this (i.e., aclocal.m4 containing private macros[*] without > >> their sources) something that should be VERY STRONGLY discouraged. > >> After all, running "reautoconf" may (does?) invoke aclocal. > > > > Yes, I agree. > > Eh? Quoting autoconf-2.59 documentation: > |To create a `configure' script with Autoconf, you need to write an > |Autoconf input file `configure.ac' (or `configure.in') and run > |`autoconf' on it. If you write your own feature tests to supplement > |those that come with Autoconf, you might also write files called > |`aclocal.m4' and `acsite.m4'. > > If I follow this advice, and write `aclocal.m4' myself, then *by > definition*, `aclocal.m4' *is* the source! Yes, you are right. But then your aclocal.m4 file doesn't start with: | # generated automatically by aclocal 1.7.9 -*- Autoconf -*- and thus autoreconf won't cause aclocal to overwrite it. Sorry for being less precise than necessary here, and thanks for the reminder. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
