Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Russ Allbery wrote on Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:41:39PM CEST:
>> which is why use of it is conditional in INN. The approach that we're >> using required figuring out what macros to call first, but it works >> well enough that I'll keep using it until someone comes up with >> something better. It's certainly better than the speed hit from using >> libtool unconditionally. > Which is fine. All I want to avoid is that anyone using this approach > comes and complains when it breaks with the next Libtool release. Oh, understood. I promise I won't complain, and I'll start using better techniques as soon as I see them. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
