Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But such a wrapper is not needed for Autoconf proper.... > ... > Luckily, there is no risk of installing a broken version of autoconf; > the build will break, since autoconf.as is a m4sh script.
Sorry, I'm lost. If Autoconf doesn't need a wrapper, then why does a build break with a 2.0-like m4? I'm fine with documenting that m4_wrap order is implementation-dependent, but I'd like to see a patch that will cause Autoconf to work regardless of m4wrap order. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
