>> aclocal is part of automake.  autoreconf should not be running it if
>> detects that you are not using automake.
>
> I disagree: aclocal is useful even when you don't use automake, for
> importing your own macros as in my case, so you should have a way to
> force its invocation if needed.

No, you shouldn't.  You should write your aclocal.m4 in a manner which
keeps the inclusion of any m4 source file it requires where it belongs
-- under your control.  You should not have to rely on an automated
tool which can automatically pull in all sorts of garbage, from any
possibly inappropriate source.

Just my 2p; you are welcome to a contrary POV :-)

Cheers,
Keith.


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Reply via email to