On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 08:16 +0200, Duft Markus wrote:
> Hi Mark!
>
> It sure would be some benefit for the *user* of the package. Still as a
> maintainer or developer, i really do need to manually configure, since i
> *never ever* install any of the development packages in the default
> prefix, this would be suicide!
That is strange, I thought that installing packages under the default
prefix of /usr/local was the normal way to install development packages.
BTW, my solution for right now will be to use the 'dist-hook' target to
add a stub Makefile to my projects' source tarballs. My stub makefile
will be named Makefile.stub and the relevant lines in Makefile.am will
be:
dist-hook:
cp Makefile.stub $(distdir)/Makefile
I will post the stub Makefile to this mailing list when it is finished.
Regards,
Mark Heily
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
