On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 14:22, Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > I've used cross-compiles (off and on) for years and I gotta say the >> first time I got this message I probably did some pissing and moaning. >> But I do believe that proper naming is the way to go. >> >> Then I created the proper names using symlinks and the problem went >> away. >> >> I've yet to see a case where fixing this in the way autoconf "wants" is >> even mildly difficult. >> > > Same here. The course has been set. Let's stick with it. Not arguing, FWIW, but as a quick check: Josef, your issue *does* go away if you use symlinks to make your toolchain match the proper form ? Going forward to implementation, Josef would make a good quick-check of the change: that the warning message changes, that he can symlink over and be functional. Allan -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "金鱼" http://linkedin.com/in/goldfish please, no proprietary attachments (http://tinyurl.com/cbgq)
_______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
