Hi again, > OK, but still the last line had no logical connection with the other > ones, so I wondered whether we were missing something.
Oh, well, AC_SUBST should only be called, if the issue checked by AC_CACHE_CHECK is true. I probably forgot to mention this either. Sorry. > Old habit. Use AS_CASE, please. It makes a difference only if its > arguments expand AC_REQUIRE statements. As I thought. I always use AS_CASE/ AS_IF, makes live a little bit more lazy...where is AS_FOR ;-)? >> Isn't SB_FOOS empty if not initialised? > Sure, but do you want it to be seedable or not? What does "seedable" mean? greetings, Stefan _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
